Understanding the "mental model"….

I came across this first image below from Gallery Hopper – regarding some work and an interview with Paolo Ventura over on FSTOP online – and a comparison came to mind thinking about how different artists approach the topic of “reality” or “ir-reality” in the nature of photographs. Both artist depict (illustrate?) staged events and fabricated models.

“The home of the poet GV”
Paolo Ventura/ HASTED HUNT Gallery NYC
Ventura – is “first an image-maker” in the sense that he creates sets or “models” that he apparently personally fabricates to a great level of detail, then carefully selects a viewpoint and “color of the air” in order to fabricate an image – the end product is a photograph depicting a scene. The work has a certain cinematic feel – very rich in detail and mood.
Police SWAT, camouflage.
“Terror Town”, Playas Training Center, NM.
Paul Shambroom
Compare this to some of the work of Paul Shambroom, in his SECURITY SERIES. Here a sort of inverse situation is presented in comparison to Ventura’s images. Particularly, the staged government training of “first responders” in staged emergency situations is interesting to consider. Both are all very real, on the one hand – yet also staged at a completely different scale. Shambroom, rather than creating a “ir-reality” finds one that actually exists – already. I find it interesting though that in the “real world” of prints – Shambroom chooses to present the images almost to full size scale printed on canvas which tampers with the surface of the photo – almost as if it is a painting and with color tones and surfaces treated more like a painting might be treated with color and even with a varnished finish. For me, this keeps the question of “is it real or not” all the more interesting…. One chooses to fabricate images based upon a personal mental model, and the other finds a kind of fictional model that exists already – both of which present images that are quite powerful and unusual in a tricky sort of way.
This leaves me thinking that the fruitful question is not whether or a photograph is “staged” – all photographs are already staged to a greater or lesser degree – but what matters more importantly is in my opinion the “content” of the image. Is it strong enough to trigger a response from the viewer?
More discussion / thoughts / viewpoints on this – as well as many other examples can be found here, here… and here….

4 thoughts on “Understanding the "mental model"….

  1. Somebody better write something modern about this – if all we have to discuss contemporary photography is Papageorge’s rejection of what he calls “staged” photography (in essence he rejects anything that’s not b/w street really) we’re in trouble.

  2. It would be a good curatorial challenge – to formulate a stance -it is an opportunity for a reputable institution to update that drawn a line in the sand so to speak.

  3. Pingback: “Storybook wolf” a depiction of a “mental model” and a real thing. « Intersecting Images

  4. Pingback: Perfectible Worlds – Sage Sohier | journal.mattniebuhr.com

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s